In the wee morning hours of March 23—just two hours after the midnight March 22 deadline—Congress completed the fraught process of funding the federal government’s discretionary spending for fiscal year (FY) 2024—six months after FY 2024 began this past October 1. President Biden signed the measure into law the same day. Despite hard lobbying, the final funding package excluded a rider that would have stopped the Department of Labor’s (DOL) work on its fiduciary rule.

On April 10, NAIFA met with the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) to express the association’s concerns about the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) proposed fiduciary rule. NAIFA reiterated its long-standing opposition to the rule, citing its probable impact on the accessibility and affordability of professional investment advice for middle-American retirement savers. Late that afternoon, OIRA sent the proposed rule back to DOL for finalization, canceling at least two subsequent previously scheduled stakeholder meetings.

Repeating their testimony at a DOL hearing last month in comments submitted to DOL, industry advocates told a January 10 House hearing that the DOL’s fiduciary-only proposed regulations must be withdrawn. Fifty House members wrote to DOL demanding the rule’s withdrawal. DOL must sift through 19,000+ comments on the rule.

When the first session of the 118^th Congress ended last month, lawmakers left undone controversial and pressing business that will make January a difficult month. Pending are government funding, international aid, and expiring law issues on which there is as yet little or no consensus. Caught in the crosshairs are a tax package with provisions of interest to NAIFA members, extension of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), and proposals to defund regulatory initiatives like the fiduciary-only rule.

At the NAIC’s Fall Meeting in Orlando, Florida (November 30 – December 3), NAIFA’s Policy Director Roger Moore testified against the Department of Labor’s proposed fiduciary-only rule during the Life and Annuities (A) Committee meeting, commenting that the rule will harm lower- and middle-income families. Moore was joined by representatives from coalition partners in expressing strong support for the NAIC’s efforts opposing DOL’s actions.

On October 31, the Department of Labor (DOL) released its new proposed fiduciary rule (which they renamed the retirement security rule). The proposal triggered immediate and intense opposition from NAIFA and from most of the retirement savings community.

Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) head Lisa Gomez is predicting changes to the Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) fiduciary rule due to “changes in the marketplace since 1975.” She noted, though, that EBSA is also considering the litigation that has overruled previous attempts by EBSA to change the fiduciary rule, especially in connection with advice on rollovers.

On July 21, the National Conference of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) adopted a NAIFA-backed resolution to oppose any new fiduciary rule from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The decision came in part as a result of NAIFA testimony highlighting why no change to current fiduciary rules is necessary.

On April 14, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) filed a notice of appeal to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on a Florida District Court ruling (American Securities Association v. United States Department of Labor) that struck down parts of the agency’s sub-regulatory guidance on the applicability of the fiduciary standard to advice on rolling over ERISA plan retirement funds into IRAs.